Note Check Free
Try the full workflow with one clinician
$0
per month
10 shared documentation actions
1 clinician on Free; 1 to 15 on paid plans.
Start freeNote Check · Included with Krasyn Scribe · Works on any scribe’s note
Included with Krasyn Scribe. Works on any scribe’s note.
Every Krasyn Scribe draft is handed to Note Check with its transcript before you sign. Paste a transcript and a note from any other scribe and the same report comes back: what the transcript supports, contradicts, or never said, plus material facts the note left out.
A private Krasyn account, no EMR switch required
One report uses one shared documentation action. Free includes 10 actions each calendar month, with no credit card and no automatic conversion to paid.
Our standard Business Associate Agreement is available for review and electronic acceptance inside the account.
Prefer to read first? See a checked example. It ships inside Krasyn Scribe. Already have a Krasyn account? Open Note Check in the app.
Who Note Check is for
- Clinicians who already use an AI scribe and want a second look before signing
- Practice leaders spot-checking whether draft notes match recorded visits
- Scribe and clinical-AI teams running structured QA on transcript-and-note pairs
It is not a chart audit, coding review, or substitute for clinician review. It checks only the note against the transcript you provide.
Try It on This Page
Try a quick preview: find numbers and denials that may not match the transcript. The fictional visit is ready to check. This preview uses two rules from the product; AI review of statements, contradictions, and omissions runs inside an account.
The synthetic example is loaded for you. Run it as it is, or paste your own de-identified pair.
What you paste stays in your browser. This panel sends nothing to Krasyn and stores nothing, so there is no copy of your text to retain or delete.
The text you paste is processed by code running in this page. It is not uploaded, stored, or sent anywhere. Even so, this public page is not a HIPAA workflow: use synthetic or de-identified text here, and run real notes inside your account, where our Business Associate Agreement and the full check apply.
What You Get
One report per transcript-and-note pair, built to be read in the order that matters and kept beside the note.
Statement-by-statement review
Each statement is labelled Supported, Unsupported, Contradicted, Scaffolding, or Unverified against the transcript you provide.
High-signal flags
Numbers that never occurred, denials that were never spoken, contradictions, and uncertain content are pulled forward for review.
Material omissions
The report lists clinically material facts stated in the transcript but absent from the note, with the supporting excerpt.
A report you can act on and keep
Items needing attention appear first. Export the plain-text report for your QA record. Note Check edits, files, and signs nothing.
Accepted note sources: Krasyn, Freed, Heidi, Nabla, Abridge, DAX, SimplePractice, Upheal, Mentalyc, any other scribe that produces text.
Start free. Pay only when you need more volume.
Note Check and Krasyn Scribe share one documentation allowance. One completed Note Check report or one scribe draft uses one action. Transcription minutes are included for recording with Krasyn, but you can paste a transcript from any source.
Scribe
For part-time or focused review volume
$39
per clinician/month
60 shared documentation actions
1 clinician on Free; 1 to 15 on paid plans.
Start 14-day trialScribe Plus
For a full weekly caseload
$99
per clinician/month
150 shared documentation actions
1 clinician on Free; 1 to 15 on paid plans.
Start 14-day trialPaid plans start with a 14-day trial and no card. Add billing only if you choose to continue. Cancel before billing and there is no charge.
A Checked Example
A synthetic transcript, a synthetic note, and the report Note Check produces for the pair. No real person, visit, or value appears here.
Note source label: "Other". The pair was written to show each verdict and flag once. This is a static rendering, not a live check.
Input 1 · Synthetic transcript
Clinician: Good to see you both. How has the blood pressure been at home? Patient: Mostly in the 120s over 70s on the home cuff. I brought the log. Clinician: Good. Any chest pain, shortness of breath, or swelling in the legs? Patient: No, none of that. Spouse: I am the one with the headaches lately, not him. Mine started last week. Clinician: We can talk about yours at your own visit. Any fever on your side? Patient: I haven't checked. I have felt fine. Clinician: Your LDL is still above where we want it. I would like to start atorvastatin, 20 milligrams at night. Patient: I would rather not start a statin yet. My brother had muscle pain on one. Can I try diet changes first? Clinician: That is reasonable. We will recheck the lipid panel in three months and revisit it then. Keep taking the lisinopril 10 milligrams every morning. Patient: Will do. Clinician: Let's see you back in three months, sooner if anything changes.
Input 2 · Synthetic AI-drafted note
Subjective: Patient presents for hypertension and hyperlipidemia follow-up. Home blood pressure readings mostly in the 120s over 70s, log reviewed. Reports new headaches beginning last week. Denies chest pain, shortness of breath, and leg swelling. Denies fever. Objective: BP 134/82. Assessment: Hypertension, controlled on current regimen. Hyperlipidemia with LDL above goal. Plan: Started atorvastatin 20 mg nightly. Continue lisinopril 10 mg every morning. Recheck lipid panel in three months.
Output · Note Check report
4 statements need your eyes first
Judge status: ran over the full transcript. Engine notecheck-1. Deterministic layer: ran.
- Supported
- 7
- Unsupported
- 2
- Contradicted
- 2
- Flags
- 2
Read these first
- ContradictedSubjective
Reports new headaches beginning last week.
Why: The headaches were described by the spouse about herself ("I am the one with the headaches lately, not him"). The patient reported no headache.
- ContradictedPlan
Started atorvastatin 20 mg nightly.
Why: The patient declined to start a statin and the clinician agreed to try diet changes first and recheck in three months.
- UnsupportedObjective
BP 134/82.
Why: No blood pressure value was spoken at the visit. The only readings discussed were the home log.
Deterministic flag num-001 · Number not in transcript: "134/82" appears in the note but no such value appears in the transcript.
- UnsupportedSubjective
Denies fever.
Why: The clinician asked about fever and the patient answered "I haven’t checked", which is not a denial.
Deterministic flag neg-001 · Denial not in transcript: Fever was raised in the transcript and never denied. Silence is not a denial.
Omissions
Return visit in three months, sooner if anything changes.
Transcript: “Let's see you back in three months, sooner if anything changes.”
Supported statements
- Subjective: Patient presents for hypertension and hyperlipidemia follow-up.
- Subjective: Home blood pressure readings mostly in the 120s over 70s, log reviewed.
- Subjective: Denies chest pain, shortness of breath, and leg swelling.
- Assessment: Hypertension, controlled on current regimen.
- Assessment: Hyperlipidemia with LDL above goal.
- Plan: Continue lisinopril 10 mg every morning.
- Plan: Recheck lipid panel in three months.
The four section headers (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) are labelled Scaffolding and are not counted as statements about the patient.
One clinician, one note
Run Note Check yourself
Start with the synthetic pair, then paste a transcript and draft from the scribe you already use. The free account includes ten checks each month.
Check a note freePractice, vendor, or governance team
Request a 50-note QA pilot
Define one decision, agree on clinician adjudication, and evaluate up to 50 transcript-and-note pairs. We report findings and uncertainty without claiming certification or universal error detection.
Fixed pilot fee: $2,500
Request the $2,500 pilotHow It Works
Three steps from the draft you already have to a review report you can use.
Step 1
Paste the source material
Paste a visit transcript and the note an AI scribe produced. SOAP, DAP, BIRP, narrative notes, and speaker-labelled or plain transcripts are supported.
Step 2
Run one check
Note Check applies deterministic checks, then an AI judge reviews statements and material omissions. The report says what ran and labels anything not assessed as Unverified.
Step 3
Review, decide, and export
Read the items needing attention first, compare them with the transcript, and decide what to change. Export the report if you need a QA record. You remain the reviewer and signer.
How the result is made repeatable and honest
Plain-code checks always run first. The AI judge then reviews remaining statements with a pinned prompt and reports whether it ran fully, partially, failed, or did not run. The finished result is stored with a fingerprint of the transcript, note, engine, and judge version, so identical inputs in your account return the same stored report. Change either input and a new report is produced.
What It Does Not Do
Stated here so you do not find it out from a report.
It does not make a note correct
A verdict is a comparison between the note and the transcript. Reading the report, deciding what to change, and signing the note remain the clinician’s work. Note Check never edits a note.
It cannot see what was never said
An exam finding the clinician observed but did not speak aloud has no transcript support and is reported as Unsupported. That is the honest label, not a judgement that the finding is false. Unsupported means "not in the transcript", nothing more.
It checks against the transcript, not the chart
Note Check compares the note to the transcript you paste. It does not open the patient chart, the medication list, or prior notes, and it does not know whether the transcript itself is complete or correct.
It is not a substitute for reading the note
The report orders the lines that most need attention, but it is a review aid. The deterministic layer is narrow by design, the model judge can be wrong, and the omissions list is bounded to material facts. Read the whole note.
We publish no accuracy figure for Note Check
We have not measured Note Check against an adjudicated reference set, so we do not state how often it is right. Our scribe drafting path has a published faithfulness benchmark with its limitations written out, and that benchmark measures the scribe, not Note Check.
The full list of things Krasyn does not do, generated from our claim-evidence system, is on What We Don’t Do. The scribe benchmark and its limitations are written up in the AI scribe faithfulness benchmark. Every two weeks the scribe red-team series runs Note Check over clinical data we did not write and publishes every disagreement, including the ones where our own check is wrong.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which AI scribes does Note Check work with?
Any of them. Krasyn, Freed, Heidi, Nabla, Abridge, DAX, SimplePractice, Upheal, Mentalyc, or anything else that produces a note as text. You paste the transcript and the note. Note Check does not connect to another vendor’s system and does not need to.
Does Note Check fix the note?
No. It reports. Each statement gets a verdict, the deterministic flags and the omissions are listed, and the lines that most need attention are placed first. What to change, and whether to sign, stays with the clinician. The note you pasted is never edited.
Will I get the same report if I run the same check twice?
Within your account, yes. The transcript, the note, the engine version, and the judge model are hashed into a fingerprint, and the finished report is stored under it. The same inputs return the stored report, identical to the first one, without a second model call. Change anything in either text and a new report is produced. The pure-code rules give the same flags on every run anywhere; the judge runs at temperature 0, and in our repeated live runs it caught every planted error each time while reason wording varied and one borderline statement moved, which is why the report is stored rather than recomputed.
What does it cost?
One Note Check report or one scribe draft uses one shared documentation action. Free includes 10 actions each month. Paid plans include 60 actions for $39 per clinician per month or 150 for $99, with a 14-day trial and no card required to start.
What do I need to paste?
A transcript, either speaker-labelled or plain, and the note in any format: SOAP, DAP, BIRP, or narrative. Note Check compares the note only to the transcript you paste. It does not read the patient chart.
What does Unverified mean?
The model judge did not return a verdict for that statement. That happens when the judge did not run, failed, omitted a verdict, or the note contained more than the maximum number of statements the judge can assess in one run. Every accepted transcript is supplied to the judge in full. The report states what occurred, Unverified statements are never counted as Supported, and deterministic flags still apply to them.
Explore More
Krasyn Scribe
The scribe that comes with the free account, and its three tiers.
Pressure Test
The seven-point worksheet for evaluating any scribe on a synthetic session.
Faithfulness Benchmark
How we measure our own scribe against its transcripts, limitations included.
What We Don’t Do
The capabilities we have deliberately not built or will not claim yet.
Check One Note Today
Paste a transcript and the note your scribe drafted from it. Read the report. Decide what to change. Free includes 10 documentation actions a month, no card.