Each rung names the evidence that has to exist before a sentence at that level may be published. A claim never skips a rung, and no amount of evidence at one rung licenses a sentence from a higher one.
E0Where the program stands today
Internal protocol, implementation, test, and content-free telemetry assertions.
- May be said
- State that the program is registered and that the infrastructure exists.
- May not be said
- Any adoption, reliability, time, correction, accuracy, clinical, safety, revenue, or outcome claim.
E1Operational counts, once a cohort runs
Participant-observable production service plus reconciled, auditable operational counts under this protocol.
- May be said
- Report scoped counts such as enrolled paid organizations and seats, unique checks, judge statuses, latency, and completion, always with dates, denominators, exclusions, and limitations.
- May not be said
- Accuracy, clinical benefit, patient safety, prevented error, causal time saving, malpractice, or outcome claim.
E2Clinical findings, gated on outside review
Independent third-party attestation matched to the exact claim, including a written quality-improvement or research determination and licensed-clinician adjudication.
- May be said
- Publish only the exact externally supported finding, after the claim-evidence matrix and the clinical, privacy, and legal gates pass.
- May not be said
- Turning treating-clinician dispositions into an accuracy estimate, or generalizing past the reviewed population.
E3Commercial truth
Settled live-mode payments, paid seats, and retained paid organizations through the existing revenue evidence spine.
- May be said
- Report paid organization, seat, and retention facts with internal, demo, test, and refund exclusions applied.
- May not be said
- Inferring clinical effectiveness from payment. Commercial proof does not raise a clinical claim above its own evidence.
The absolute ceiling
Until an external determination and a licensed-clinician adjudication are on file, Krasyn publishes no Note Check accuracy percentage, no sensitivity or specificity figure, no error-prevention rate, no patient-outcome improvement, no malpractice-risk reduction, no clinical validation, and no causal time-savings figure. This holds for the program, for benchmark publicity, and for anything a salesperson would like to say.
Clinician dispositions collected during the program are treating-clinician workflow judgements. They are not blinded adjudication, and they cannot be turned into an accuracy estimate. There is no blinded clinical adjudication in this protocol, and the protocol says so in its own text.